Can you be both "elegant" and "down-to-earth"? I always thought elegance describes a superfluous component. I need grammar police/english teacher input on this one.
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
Are you sure you want to call upon the grammar police? It's more like the grammars SS in these parts. Beware.
But before he arrives, I'll give my 2 cents. (Whatever that means.)
"Down-to-earth" means practical and realistic. And when "elegant" is used to described design, it can be used to describe its simplicity and consistency of design. So there are parallels.
I just wouldn't use them both to describe the same thing. Why? Because I wouldn't.
1 comment:
Are you sure you want to call upon the grammar police? It's more like the grammars SS in these parts. Beware.
But before he arrives, I'll give my 2 cents. (Whatever that means.)
"Down-to-earth" means practical and realistic. And when "elegant" is used to described design, it can be used to describe its simplicity and consistency of design. So there are parallels.
I just wouldn't use them both to describe the same thing. Why? Because I wouldn't.
Post a Comment